Mail Ballot Voter Identification
Adds an ID number requirement to mail ballots, on top of the signature.
Cheat sheet The whole measure in 30 seconds tap to open
Voters must provide identification information with their mail ballot, in addition to their signature.
Mail ballots continue to be verified by signature alone.
Strongest case for
Government-issued ID numbers are more consistent and less subjective than comparing signatures, and most voters either have an eligible ID or know their Social Security number.
Strongest case against
It adds a burden to voting without meaningfully improving security, and eligible voters' ballots could go uncounted over minor mistakes.
Watch out: The eight-day cure window mirrors today's signature-discrepancy process, so the mechanism is familiar - but this creates a whole new way for a ballot to land in that pile. Any Colorado ID used must be Real ID compliant.
What this actually does
For federal and statewide elections you would have to write the last four digits of your Social Security number, Colorado driver's license, or Colorado ID card on your mail ballot - in addition to signing the envelope as you do now. If the number is missing or does not match the state voter database, your county has to contact you, and you have eight days after election day to fix it or the ballot is not counted. This does not change what ID you can use to vote in person.
What your vote means
Voters must provide identification information with their mail ballot, in addition to their signature.
Mail ballots continue to be verified by signature alone.
On every measure, yes means change something and no means leave it alone.
Easiest thing to get wrong
Read this twice
The eight-day cure window mirrors today's signature-discrepancy process, so the mechanism is familiar - but this creates a whole new way for a ballot to land in that pile. Any Colorado ID used must be Real ID compliant.
The case each side makes
Straight from the state's official booklet, shortened. These are arguments as each side makes them — not findings of fact, and not our view.
Why people say yes
- Government-issued ID numbers are more consistent and less subjective than comparing signatures, and most voters either have an eligible ID or know their Social Security number.
- Anyone without the required ID can still vote in person using a broader set of documents, and the added check builds public confidence that ineligible ballots are not counted.
Why people say no
- It adds a burden to voting without meaningfully improving security, and eligible voters' ballots could go uncounted over minor mistakes.
- Voters with privacy concerns about putting sensitive numbers on a ballot envelope, or who cannot produce the required ID, will be discouraged from using mail voting - Colorado's most common method - when signature verification already works and catches the rare fraudulent ballot.
Where this sits politically
high confidence Filed by a Republican former county elections official and a Republican attorney, with $4.2 million from national conservative-aligned funds and no comparable opposition. Tightening mail-ballot verification is a signature conservative elections priority.
How we place the needle and why it is an estimate, not a measurement
We read four things, all of them public and documented:
- Who filed it and what they are affiliated with.
- The recorded party vote, where one exists. On this ballot only Proposition NN has one, because it is the only measure the legislature referred.
- Which side of the political infrastructure is paying for each campaign.
- Which direction the policy moves compared with current law.
Confidence is high when all four point the same way and low when they contradict each other. A low-confidence needle is telling you the measure genuinely does not sort neatly — Amendment 86 is the clearest case, with conservative sponsors and anti-gerrymandering content.
This is our editorial read, not a measurement. A citizen initiative has no party sponsor, so for 13 of these 14 measures there is no official partisan label to report — only inference. Use the needle to get oriented, then read the measure and decide for yourself.
What it costs
Up to $2.7 million in 2026-27 and about $1.2 million a year after. Counties carry up to $2.5 million of that, with roughly 45 percent reimbursed by the state. The Department of State spends $100,000 then $200,000 on voter outreach; its share has historically come from business filing fees, which may have to rise.
Who it touches: Every Colorado voter who votes by mail - 92 percent of all ballots cast in 2024 - and every county election office.
Who put it on your ballot
Republican
People who filed it
Campaigning for it
Campaigning against it
Chuck Broerman is a Republican and was El Paso County's clerk and recorder, the county's top elections official. Suzanne Taheri is a Republican attorney and former state deputy secretary of state.
Who is paying for the ads
Money for it
Money against it
What the money tells you
The single best-funded campaign on the 2026 ballot, and almost all of it is out-of-state-style pass-through money from three national-sounding funds. Nothing comparable is organized against it.
Figures are a late-September 2026 snapshot from TRACER campaign-finance filings and will have moved since. A committee marked slate spreads one total across several measures — do not read its number as spending on this measure alone.
Questions people ask
Common questions (6)
The things people want to know before they vote, answered from primary sources where they exist. Every answer was drafted with AI assistance from retrieved documents, then read and approved by a person. Figures carry the year they refer to.
How many Coloradans vote by mail, and how are mail ballots verified today?
In Colorado, 92 percent of voters cast their ballots by mail in 2024, and those ballots are currently verified by matching the voter's signature on the envelope to the state database.
Every active registered voter in Colorado automatically receives a ballot by mail. According to the 2026 State Ballot Information Booklet, 92 percent of all ballots cast in 2024 were mail ballots.
When a voter returns a mail ballot today, they must sign the outside of the return envelope. Election staff and bipartisan election judges compare this signature to the voter's signature on file, such as from their driver's license or past voter records. If the signature is missing or does not match, the county contacts the voter. The voter then has eight days after Election Day to "cure," or fix, the issue so their ballot can be counted.
Measure A84 would require voters to also write an identification number, such as the last four digits of a Social Security number or Colorado driver's license, on the envelope. Supporters say an ID number provides an objective verification method that promotes public confidence in elections. Opponents say the current signature verification process is already secure, and argue that requiring an ID number on the envelope raises privacy concerns and could cause valid ballots to be rejected.
Which other states require identification with a mail ballot, and what happened to turnout there?
Several states require an ID number or a copy of a photo ID with a mail ballot, with varying impacts on voter participation.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures and Ballotpedia, while most states rely on signature matching, some require additional identification: * Texas and Georgia require an ID number, like a driver's license or partial Social Security number, on the ballot envelope. * Arkansas and North Carolina require a physical copy of a photo ID returned with the ballot. * Alabama, Kentucky, and New Hampshire require a copy of an ID when requesting a mail ballot.
When Texas added its ID number requirement in 2021, mail ballot rejections spiked. A 2025 Brennan Center study found that of 18,000 Texas voters whose mail ballots were rejected in the 2022 primary, only 344 voted in person, lowering turnout for that group. Conversely, when Georgia added a similar requirement in 2021, an Atlanta Journal-Constitution analysis found only 0.6 percent of absentee ballots were rejected for ID issues in late 2021 elections.
Supporters, including Georgia's Secretary of State, argue ID requirements add security without reducing access. Opponents, like the group VoteRiders, argue the rules confuse voters and create barriers for those lacking the required documents.
How many other states currently require voters to provide an identification number on their mail ballot envelopes?
Six other states currently require voters to write an identification number on their mail ballot return envelope.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures and Ballotpedia in 2026, these states are: * Georgia * Minnesota * New Mexico * Ohio * Texas * Utah (which added the requirement in 2025)
In these states, voters must provide a driver's license number, a state ID number, or the last four digits of their Social Security number on the outside of the envelope. Election officials then compare this number to the voter's registration record.
Currently, Colorado verifies mail ballots by comparing the voter's signature on the envelope to the signature on file. Measure A84 would add the ID number requirement on top of the signature check.
If a voter forgets to include the number or writes a number that does not match their record, the ballot can be rejected. In Texas, a 2021 law requiring ID numbers on ballot envelopes led to rejected ballots when voters could not remember which number they originally used to register, according to 2025 reporting by Votebeat.
The Colorado Legislative Council estimates that checking these identification numbers and notifying voters of errors would cost state and local governments up to $2.7 million in the first year and $1.2 million annually after that.
How many Colorado mail ballots are currently rejected each election due to signature mismatches or missing signatures?
In recent elections, Colorado has ultimately rejected between roughly 18,000 and 35,000 mail ballots due to missing or mismatched signatures.
- In 2024, 35,255 ballots were rejected for signature mismatches, according to federal Election Administration and Voting Survey data.
- In 2020, 21,838 ballots were rejected for signature verification issues, according to the Colorado Secretary of State's Office.
- In 2016, about 18,800 ballots were rejected for signature issues (roughly 16,200 for discrepancies and 2,660 for missing signatures), according to a Colorado Sun analysis of state data.
These figures represent ballots that remained uncured. Under current law, if a bipartisan team of election judges finds a missing or mismatched signature, the county must notify the voter. Voters have until eight days after Election Day to fix or cure the issue, often using the state's TXT2Cure smartphone system.
Supporters of Measure A84 argue that signature matching is subjective and an ID number provides a more secure, objective way to verify identity. Opponents argue the current signature verification system works well and that adding an ID requirement will cause more eligible voters to have their ballots rejected over simple clerical errors.
How many registered voters in Colorado currently lack a Social Security number, state driver's license, or state ID?
There is currently no reliable official figure for exactly how many registered voters in Colorado lack a Social Security number, state driver's license, or state ID.
To register to vote in Colorado, residents are asked to provide a state driver's license, state ID, or the last four digits of their Social Security number. Voters without these can still register but must provide an alternative identification, such as a utility bill or passport, when voting. Because of this, most registered voters already have one of the required numbers on file.
Neither the 2026 State Ballot Information Booklet (the state's official voter guide known as the "Blue Book") nor the measure's fiscal note provides a specific count of voters lacking these IDs.
Supporters of Amendment 84 argue that requiring these numbers adds security to mail ballots, noting that most people already use these IDs for daily activities. Opponents argue the requirement could disenfranchise eligible voters who lack these specific documents. While Colorado-specific data is unavailable, opponents of similar 2026 measures in other states cite a University of Maryland survey estimating that 21 percent of voting-age Americans lack a driver's license with their current name and address.
In states that recently added ID number requirements to mail ballots, how did the overall ballot rejection rate change?
In states that recently added ID number requirements to mail ballots, rejection rates initially spiked before settling at levels higher than in previous years.
Texas and Georgia both passed laws in 2021 requiring voters to provide a driver's license or Social Security number on their mail ballots.
According to data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission and state election offices, Texas experienced the most significant changes: * In the 2020 general election, Texas rejected 0.8 percent of mail ballots. * In the 2022 primary, the first election under the new law, the rejection rate jumped to 12.4 percent, with most rejections caused by missing or mismatched ID numbers. * By the 2022 general election, the Texas rejection rate dropped to 3.4 percent, which was still more than four times its 2020 rate and more than double the 2022 national average of 1.5 percent.
Georgia saw a smaller increase, with its mail ballot rejection rate rising from under 1 percent in 2020 to 1.7 percent in the 2024 general election.
Supporters of ID requirements argue they improve election security by replacing subjective signature matching with objective, verifiable data. Opponents argue the requirements cause confusion and disproportionately disenfranchise older voters, voters with disabilities, and those who cannot remember which ID number they originally used to register.
Go deeper, if you want
We had two AIs summarize this independently Agree
Both models got the same official text, the same instructions, and could not see each other's answer. Here is each one in its own words.
Claude
For federal and statewide elections you would have to write the last four digits of your Social Security number, Colorado driver's license, or Colorado ID card on your mail ballot - in addition to signing the envelope as you do now. If the number is missing or does not match the state voter database, your county has to contact you, and you have eight days after election day to fix it or the ballot is not counted. This does not change what ID you can use to vote in person.
Flagged: The eight-day cure window mirrors today's signature-discrepancy process, so the mechanism is familiar - but this creates a whole new way for a ballot to land in that pile. Any Colorado ID used must be Real ID compliant.
Gemini
Right now, Colorado voters only need to sign their mail-in ballots to prove who they are. This measure would change the rules so voters must also write the last four digits of their Social Security number or Colorado ID on the envelope. If the numbers are missing or do not match, the voter will have eight days to fix the mistake before their vote is thrown out.
Flagged: This measure only changes the rules for mail-in ballots; the identification requirements for voting in person remain exactly the same.
Where they came apart
- Substantively the same, including the cost figures and the eight-day cure window.
- The two chose different catches, and both are worth knowing. Gemini: in-person voting ID rules do not change at all. Claude: any Colorado ID used has to be Real ID compliant, and this creates a new way for a ballot to end up in the cure pile.
- Gemini writes that a ballot gets 'thrown out'; the Blue Book says 'not counted.' Same outcome, slightly hotter word.
The comparison notes were written by Claude — one of the two models grading the contest — which is exactly why both summaries are printed above them in full.
The other model's take on cost and reach second opinion
Cost: It will cost state and local governments up to $2.7 million in the first year and $1.2 million annually after that for extra election staff, printing, and voter outreach. The state may raise business filing fees to help cover these costs.
Who it touches: All Colorado voters who cast their ballots by mail or drop box.
Did this explanation help?
Rate the explanation, not the measure. It tells us what to write better.
Discussion
Disagreement is welcome. Personal attacks are not.
No comments yet. Be the first.
Source: 2026 Colorado State Ballot Information Booklet (the "Blue Book"), Legislative Council of the Colorado General Assembly, Research Publication No. 842. Read the original.